Search results for: part
Impacts of Tsilhqot’in Part VI: Effect of Aboriginal Title on Private Property
In Parts I to V of this series on Tsilhqot’in Nation v. British Columbia, we examined the impact of proven Aboriginal title on Crown and treaty lands. In Part VI, we explore the answer to two important remaining questions: Is it possible for Aboriginal title to be proved over private land? If so, what effect…
Read MoreImpacts of Tsilhqot’in Part V: Aboriginal Title and Treaties
In Part V of our seven-part series on Tsilhqot’in Nation v. British Columbia, we explore the implications of the decision on treaty land. Some commentators have suggested that while the Tsilhqot’in decision has significant implications for non-treaty land, land subject to treaty is generally not affected by Tsilhqot’in. Our view is that this is a…
Read MoreImpacts of Tsilhqot’in Part IV: First Nations Consent for Development
As discussed in previous articles in this series, the Supreme Court of Canada’s Tsilhqot’in Nation v. British Columbia decision alters the legal landscape for development on proven Aboriginal title land: subject to a limited right of the government to infringe Aboriginal title where justified, Aboriginal groups have the exclusive right to decide how the land…
Read MoreImpacts of Tsilhqot’in Part III: Implications for Controversial Projects
As discussed in Part I and Part II of this series on the Tsilhqot’in decision, proven Aboriginal title confers on an Aboriginal group the exclusive right to decide how the land is used and to benefit from those uses, subject to the right of the government to infringe Aboriginal title where justified. In Part III of…
Read MoreImpacts of Tsilhqot’in Part II: Federal and Provincial Laws on Aboriginal Title Land
In Part II of our seven-part series on Tsilhqot’in Nation v. British Columbia, we ask and answer the following important question: can government pass and enforce federal and provincial laws that apply Aboriginal title land? The short and simple answer is “yes” – even once Aboriginal title is proved over an area of land, as…
Read MoreImpacts of Tsilhqot’in Part I: A Basic Guide to the Decision
This is the first in a series of seven articles on the Supreme Court of Canada’s recent decision on Aboriginal title and its expected impacts. This article provides an overview of the key elements of the decision and poses the six key questions that we will answer in the coming weeks as part of this…
Read MoreProud Announcement – Three MT+Co. Lawyers Recognized as Benchmark Litigation Stars 2024
Join us in celebrating Joelle Walker, Merle Alexander, KC, and Myles Brown for their well-deserved recognition as 2024 Benchmark Litigation Stars and MT + Co’s Litigation + Dispute Resolution Group’s recognition as a Benchmark Recommended Firm for 2024. Benchmark Litigation is the only publication on the market to focus exclusively on litigation. Since its inception, Benchmark has grown…
Read MoreIT + Facilities Manager (16-Month Maternity Coverage)
About The Role The IT + Facilities Manager is a multifunctional role with management responsibility over Facilities and IT functions for multiple locations (Vancouver and Victoria). Covering the Facilities + IT Manager position at Miller Titerle, you will oversee the internal day-to-day technology and office troubleshooting while supporting the IT + Facilities team. You will…
Read MoreFull Transparency: Answering Questions From Employers and Employees About BC’s Pay Transparency Act
The recent enactment of British Columbia’s Pay Transparency Act (the “Act”) has piqued widespread interest from both employers and employees throughout British Columbia. The Act, which took effect on May 11, 2023, endeavors to address the documented gender-wage gap in B.C. by imposing certain restrictions and obligations on BC employers. Under the Act, employers are…
Read MoreSecret Recordings: Legal Implications Explored
Introduction The recent Court of Appeal decision in Shalagin v. Mercer Celgar Limited Partnership, 2023 BCCA 373 (“Mercer”) cautions employees about making surreptitious/secret recordings in the workplace. While an employee may record situations that are necessary to expose an injustice such as workplace bullying, the courts discourage the practice because it can foster distrust in…
Read More